The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has initiated legal proceedings against President Bola Tinubu’s administration to ensure financial transparency.
The lawsuit, filed last Friday at the Federal High Court in Lagos, seeks to compel the publication of detailed spending reports and agreements concerning loans acquired by previous administrations, including those of former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Umaru Yar’Adua, Goodluck Jonathan, and Muhammadu Buhari.
The organisation insists that the public’s right to know how public funds are spent is essential for democratic governance and accountability.
SERAP’s suit aims to force the Minister of Finance, Wale Edun, and the Debt Management Office to disclose how these loans, amounting to billions of dollars, were utilised.
The organisation argued that transparency in loan agreements and expenditures is crucial for Nigerians to assess their government’s performance, especially given the persistent extreme poverty and inadequate public services despite significant borrowing.
SERAP stated, “Transparency in loan agreements and expenditures is critical for Nigerians to evaluate their government’s performance, especially in light of persistent extreme poverty and inadequate public services despite substantial borrowing.”
In a statement signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP emphasised that the outcome of this case could significantly enhance the transparency and accountability mechanisms in Nigeria’s financial management.
The statement was titled, “SERAP sues Tinubu govt over failure to account for loans by ex-presidents.”
In the suit number FHC/L/CS/353/2024 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, Lagos, SERAP is asking the court to “direct and compel the Tinubu government to publish the loan agreements obtained by the governments of former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, Goodluck Jonathan, and Muhammadu Buhari.”
SERAP is also asking the court to “direct and compel the Tinubu government to publish the spending details of any such loans, including the interests and other payments so far made on the loans.”
In the suit, SERAP is arguing that “no one should be able to pull curtains of secrecy around decisions on the spending of public funds which can be revealed without injury to the public interest. Democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires transparency.”
SERAP is also arguing that “the Tinubu government should make it possible for citizens to have access to the agreements and spending details to judge whether their government is working for them or not.”
“The information may help to explain why, despite several billions of dollars in loans obtained by successive governments, millions of Nigerians continue to face extreme poverty and lack access to basic public goods and services,” the statement added.
SERAP is arguing that “Nigerians’ right to a democratic governance allows them to appreciably influence the direction of government, and have an opportunity to assess progress and assign blame.”
SERAP is also arguing that, “the accountability of government to the general public is a hallmark of democratic governance, which Nigeria seeks to achieve.”
The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare and Andrew Nwankwo, read in part:
“Publishing the loan agreements would improve public accountability in ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs).”
“Nigerians are entitled to information about what their government is doing in their name. This is part of their right to information.
“Publishing the agreements and spending details would allow the public to see how and on what these governments spent the loans and foster transparency and accountability.
“Publishing the loan agreements signed by the governments of former presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, Goodluck Jonathan, and Muhammadu Buhari, and widely publishing the agreements would allow Nigerians to scrutinise it and to demand accountability for the spending of the loans.
“According to Nigeria’s Debt Management Office, the total public domestic debt portfolio for the country’s is N97.3 trillion ($108 billion). The Federal Government’s debt is N87.3 trillion ($97 billion).”
“Nigeria paid $6.2 billion in 2019 as interest on loans, while the country paid $6.5 billion as interest in 2018.
Nigeria also paid $5 billion as interest on loans in 2017, while the country paid $4.4 billion as interest in 2016. For 2015, the interest paid on loans was $5.5 billion.
“Substantial parts of the loans obtained by successive governments since the return of democracy in 1999 may have been mismanaged, diverted, or stolen, and in any case remain unaccounted for.
“Persons with public responsibilities ought to be answerable to the people for the performance of their duties, including the management of the loans obtained between May 1999 and May 2023,” the statement read.
The organisation noted that this action is necessary to curb corruption and financial mismanagement.
“The Tinubu government has a responsibility to ensure transparency and accountability in how any loans obtained by the Federal Government are spent, to reduce vulnerability to corruption and mismanagement.”
“The Freedom of Information Act, Section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution, Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantee to everyone the right to information, including to copies of the loan agreements obtained by successive governments since 1999.”
“By the combined reading of the provisions of the Constitution of Nigeria, the Freedom of Information Act 2011, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, there are transparency obligations imposed on the Tinubu government to widely publish the agreements and details of the projects on which the loans were spent.”
“The Nigerian Constitution, Freedom of Information Act, and the country’s anti-corruption and human rights obligations rest on the principle that citizens should have access to information regarding their government’s activities,” it further read.
Meanwhile, according to the statement, no date has been set for the suit is hearing.
TRIBUNE
